Clarifying structure modification in HACKING was Re: Suppress display of sensitive info by servers (proposal)
From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2005-04-13 21:04:20 CEST
--On Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:47 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney
> I still think it's technically a violation of the policy, but considering
My interpretation of HACKING and APR's versioning policy is different than
So, to make this clearer, would there be any opposition to adding a clause
--- Structure Modifications Publicly exposed structures (i.e. svn_<type>_t) where a defined constructor is available (i.e. svn_<type>_create) may only be modified in the same MAJOR line by adding fields to the end of structure. No modifications to a public structure may be adopted in MAJOR.MINOR line. Private (opaque) structures may be modified at any time. --- Rewords welcome. =) Right now, I think this is implied. But, that's probably because we've adopted this policy implicitly in APR. Thoughts? -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Wed Apr 13 21:05:13 2005 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.