Re: Suppress display of sensitive info by servers (proposal)

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> wrote on 04/13/2005 02:56:08 PM:

> I agree that we can add a field to svn_error_t, but I don't think this
> proposal will solve the problem. Generally when the path to the
> repository shows up in an error message, the pathname came from a failed
> svn_io_* operation, which is not really smart enough to make decisions
> about what would be a "safe" error message.

But isn't the proposal to generate the normal error message and a "safe
version" then let mod_dav_svn/svnserve etc. decide which one to use? I
presume that svn_io_* has an idea when the error message contains a path
name.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 13 21:00:58 2005