Re: 1.2.0-rc1 Windows binaries?

--On Wednesday, April 13, 2005 7:38 PM +0200 "Jostein Chr. Andersen"
<jostein@josander.net> wrote:

> IMHO, I think that a build from the httpd-2.0.x branch is best -- at
> least if mod_dav|_svn will be Apache 2.0.54 compatible; if not then a
> delivery without modules.

FWIW, Sander's already tagged 2.0.54:

<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.0.54/>

I believe there are enough votes for 2.0.54 to be released on dev@httpd as
of now. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 13 20:03:38 2005