[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r14031 - trunk/subversion/clients/cmdline

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2005-04-12 04:11:57 CEST

--On Monday, April 11, 2005 7:34 PM -0500 kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> Julian wasn't proposing that Subversion enforce this behavior, only
> that Subversion offer the ability to enforce it, to be decided by each
> repository's policy.

I'm thinking you meant Justin not Julian there. (Ju<tab> in emacs, eh?) =)

Yes, to reiterate: my point was that we may ship out-of-the-box not to enforce
mandatory locking in the presence of needs-lock. However, I feel that this is
going to be a common use case that people are going to want and we need to
make it clear that we support that.

> If the debate is simply whether or not to ship
> with this particular commented-out template in a hook script,
> well... then we truly are painting the bikeshed, and I withdraw.

=) -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 12 04:13:36 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.