On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:33:04PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > In addition to collecting statistics on how much these solutions might
> > save us, we might also want to think about how the current scheme might
> > be distorting repository practices. For instance, how many Subversion
> > development branches are we willing to tolerate, given that each one
> > generates a weekly merge of all the changes to the trunk?
>
> As far as I know, we don't adjust the number of branches we use, nor
> do we adjust our merging patterns, based on repository storage issues.
> We may adjust these things for user-visible branch management reasons,
> but that's a totally different concern.
>
> So I didn't quite follow your question...
>
I decided to rebranch svnserve-ssl rather than merge the trunk
changes for exactly this reason.
--ben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 12 03:11:58 2005