[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: New "svn version" command [was: Subversion 1.2.0 Release Candidate 1 released.]

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2005-04-10 07:39:12 CEST

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 21:32, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:58:26AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> > In fact, I'll veto now: -1 on releasing v1.2 with this in its current state.
> You realize that removing this requires us to restart the soak... Is it
> really that important?

Why would it require us to restart the soak? According to HACKING, only
destabilizing changes and incompatible API changes require a restart of
the full four-week soak.

(Sorry to come in a bit late here. My main comment on the thread is
that if you're going to justify "svn version" with "svn version URL",
then you need to *actually implement* "svn version URL" first.
Justifying a questionable half-measure with a future improvement is a
recipe for having lots of questionable half-measures in the code base.)

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 10 07:40:26 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.