Re: Subversion and Macintosh resource fork
From: señior ¿tyrtle? <machtyrtle_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-04-10 03:13:36 CEST
>
True...but they're still failry prominent...and by not supporting them
> 2. Resource forks can be EXTREMELY LARGE, and while Subversion
Sure for 'applications'..but for documents, theyre usually not that big
> 3. You can use Rez and Derez (shipped with Apple's Developer Tools) to
I can fly to Tokyo to get to Paris as well.
> 4. This feature is completely Apple specific.
Maybe I wasn't specific enough regarding the implementation, but it's a
> Based on 1, 2, 3, and 4 listed above, I'm against adding this
In 1.1.2 there was:
now there's
almost always following eachother in code...with roughly the same purpose of
Reducing these two to a single call that will handle all special cases seems
1. Code that is platform specfic will actually be moved out of lib_wc
2. Requests in the manner of 'I want Subversion to store 'x' information of
Anyway, Resource forks have and will come up again by Mac users...would be
> PS With your address of 'spam_at_spam.spam', I have little hope of you
Sorry, trying to switch mail-clients....prooving to be difficultSorry,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.