On Saturday 09 April 2005 03:12, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Philip Martin wrote:
> > "Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> writes:
> > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Philip Martin wrote:
> > >> "Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> writes:
> > >> >> not even any indication that I should write a log message.
> > >> >
> > >> > Same applies for propedit.
> > >>
> > >> Huh? Propedit doesn't use a log message.
> > >
> > > Neither does lock, it uses a lock comment;)
> >
> > Again huh? Propedit doesn't pop up a blank editor.
>
> If the prop value is empty, it does... But let's stop this ping-pong
> game before it degenerates. I wouldn't object to it.
>
> Anyone think this is important enough to implement?
I'm all for consistency. To me, locking is almost the same as committing,
in that it involves interaction with the server that is longer term. So,
I'd like to see it have the same format as the log message.
-John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 9 13:23:51 2005