Julian Foad wrote:
> Mathias.Weinert@gfa-net.de wrote:
>> kfogel@collab.net writes:
>> > Wouldn't 'svn ls --recursive --verbose' or something like that do what
>> > you needed?
>>
>> Not exactly:
>
>> - 'svn ls' works on working copies resp. repository urls whereas svnlook
>> directly works on the repository
>
> I'm not quite sure what you mean by "resp." but I think you mean "and
> not"; but that is not true. "svn ls" also works directly on repository
> URLs:
> svn ls -R http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/www
> [...]
> faq.html
> favicon.ico
> getting_subversion.html
> images/
> images/bsddaemon.png
> images/debian.jpg
> [...]
>
>> The first two things are not really a problem but the third one seems to
>> be a problem for me.
>
> Is it still a problem? :-)
Even if it isn't, I'm still feeling inclined to commit the patch.
It's small, neat, and a sensible capability for svnlook to have.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 5 13:33:41 2005