[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Release procedures improvements.

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: 2005-04-05 02:09:46 CEST

On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:32:49PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> I like this solution. It allows us to do everything openly, yet
> greatly reduces the risk of people treating the thing like a release
> prematurely.
> Ben, Justin, et al, thoughts?

I'm okay with it. I don't think it's likely someone is going to "lose"
the PRERELEASE naming on the file. Only downsides I can think of is
it's going to alter the output of (md5|sha1)sum commands a little. But
I don't think that's a reason not to do it.

That said I'm still not thrilled with it. Just not seeing any important
reasons it's bad.

Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 5 02:24:14 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.