On 2005-04-02 15:07:33 Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Saturday, April 2, 2005 04:44+0200 Øyvind A. Holm wrote:
> > No, I wouldn't say that a delay of five days qualifies to be defined
> > as "hasty". I read the message from 2005-03-26 20:28:46Z a couple of
> > days later, but there weren't any definitive messages about "release
> > tagging happen at about [insert time here]" until a message dated
> > 2005-03-31 03:06:34Z. After that, some minor changes was nominated,
> > approved and merged, the last one at 2005-04-01 16:05:16Z.
>
> I replied to the message 'TIME TO ROLL 1.1.4' (in all caps,
> nevertheless) on Thursday morning saying that I was going to roll
> 1.1.4 on Friday morning. It's not my fault that you overlooked that
> message. So, I don't know how much more explicit we could have been
> given the subject line. -- justin
Nevermind. All the Norwegian stuff got merged over in time, so I'm sort
of happy. I was merely thinking of the other translations and all that
didn't get merged there. But it's not my domain anyway, just caring a
bit too much about trivial things. The current system works if the
messages is regularly merged to the branch.
-- sunny256
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 3 11:55:52 2005