Re: [patch] python docstring generation with swig through doxygen

On 31-03-2005 13:05, "Max Bowsher" <maxb@ukf.net> wrote:
<snip/>
> First, there's no point doxygenifying comments which are not processed by
> doxygen - so that means, nothing outside subversion/include/.

Check.

> Second, doxygen (I'm using 1.4.2) appears to be automagically entity-fying
> the & characters in the HTML output engine (but not very consistently).
>
> If I apply your patch, I get a link like:
>
> ......&amp;........
>
> which is clearly wrong.

Hmm. Not what I got (I think I have an older version). Does your version
result in malformed xml if you don't apply the & -> &amp; patch?

> So, since the HTML is the primary output format for us, I must reject this
> patch.

Ack.

> Perhaps you would like to contact the doxygen people, and report this
> inconsistency between the HTML and XML output engines?

Uhm, yeah, I'll try and find some time :-D

Cheers,

Leo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 2 17:13:25 2005