Re: Misrepresentation of BerkeleyDB FS module as "base"

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> writes:
>
>> Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> writes:
>>
>>> $ svn --version
>>> svn, version 1.2.0 (dev build)
>>> compiled Mar 30 2005, 16:04:46
>>> [...snip ...]
>>> The following repository back-end (FS) modules are available:
>>>
>>> * fs_base : Module for working with a Berkeley DB repository.
>>> * fs_fs : Module for working with a plain file (FSFS) repository.
>>
>> Shouldn't these match the name svnadmin --fs-type expects?
>
> Yes, please.

No, thankyou.

/me stops being flippant.

Seriously, those are module names, and fs_base is correct.

If you want to try and work the fs types provided by each module into the
list, great! But don't pretend that fs types and module names are the same.

Max.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 1 00:48:35 2005