Re: PROPOSAL: /ports top-level directory in Subversion repository

On Feb 27, 2005, at 6:38 PM, kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
>> Ok, so there's more than one of these kind of branches, that still
>> doesn't convince me that they're any different than any other long
>> lived branch. What's wrong with /branches/vms?
>
> This is a bikeshed, but I like Garrett's paint best, FWIW.
>
> All branches have a purpose. Why should the "porting" purpose be
> special? Let's just put these in branches (or, if we want a ports
> area, then branches/ports/* is the answer).
>

+1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 28 05:10:36 2005