Re: Experimental Win32 package from trunk/r13021

(Sorry, sent to personal address by accident; resending to the list)

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 02:29:16 +0100, Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:

> I really don't like this idea at all. Perl has a standard installation
> procedure for modules, and we should either follow that -- which means
> somebody has to do the work and write appropriate scripts -- or more or
> less stand by the original proposal.

The less intrusive thing, I think, is doing my original proposal, but
using perl/site/lib/SVN and perl/site/lib/auto/SVN (as Toby said)
instead of perl/SVN and perl/auto/SVN. This way we're not messing with
Perl installation, just moving things around a little on the
svn-win32-1.2.0_pl.zip, and making easier for a user to "use" the
modules.

Of course, having a PPM/PPD script would be nice, but that's a
different issue that we can tackle separatedly.

-- 
                    /L/e/k/t/u
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org