Re: RFC: Interesting keywords inelegance

Max Bowsher wrote:

> OK, it's a balance - I can understand that. But I'm worried that we may
> have _some_ complexity, which offers too little control to be useful.
>
> I guess I would be reassured if someone can quote some use cases where
> it is useful for svn:keywords to have a value including all 5 keywords.

But I would think that the situation is actually the opposite: it is
very useful to have svn:keywords have values for less than all 5
keywords. AFAIK, the only common use for setting all 5 is in the test
suite to make sure they all work. ;)

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org