[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] svn now stores unix-owner, -group, and -mode too

From: Ph. Marek <philipp.marek_at_bmlv.gv.at>
Date: 2005-02-07 08:28:37 CET

Hello Philip,

I'm sorry for the delay.
I'll try to answer the questions you've sent; but I'll rearrange them a bit.

> Please provide a short description of the behaviour you intend to
> implement. Some questions:
>
> - Is there a way to enable/disable the behaviour?
The whole thing is currently triggered by auto-props and the config option
"use-commit-times". If eg. a property "svn:owner" is set on a file, it will
be sent to the repository as the current value.
So you'd have in your ~/.subversion/config something like this:
 [auto-props]
 * = svn:text-time=yes;svn:owner=yes;svn:group=yes;svn:unix-mode=yes
or whatever values you'd like, and they'd be set on commit (and import).

> - If I change the owner/group/mode of the working copy does this get
> committed, or do I have to do an explicit propset?
On every commit because of text-changes the properties are set to the current
values. Currently this happens *only* on text-changes, but read below.

> - I assume the owner/group/mode of the working copy files get set
> during checkout, does it apply to directories as well?
As I work with auto-properties, and these (currently) work only with files.
But I thought about implementing auto-dir-props too.

> - Non-root Unix users cannot usually change ownership, does this cause
> lots of warnings or errors?
No, this is silently ignored.

> - Do updates modify the working copy owner/group/mode?
I believe it does; but I'm not sure. I can't test at the moment.

> - If an update changes the owner/group/mode does it generate conflicts
> with local changes, or do conflicts only occur if the wc properties
> are modified?
The conflict handling is currently unspecified.
But if these properties are handled like "svn:eol-style" (and cause a
re-translation of the file), the new values would be in effect immediately.

> > I did some amount of testing, but remarks are always appreciated.
> >
> > (I know that a rewrite of libsvn_wc is planned which possibly does all
> > that, but as it may take some time I did a patch for the current code)
>
> A rewrite has been mentioned, but that doesn't mean it is planned.
>
> > * subversion-1.1.3.tstamp/subversion/include/svn_io.h
>
> We need a patch against trunk, not 1.1.3.
There you have me. It's not that simple for me to do that, as I'm behind a
firewall.

I know that these patches are not complete right now; saving
directory-metadata needs some more work, and there'll be some other missing
things too.

Regards,

Phil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 7 08:30:11 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.