Re: autogen.sh and build/buildcheck.sh

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2005-01-31 23:27:03 CET

--On Friday, January 28, 2005 10:30 PM +0000 Max Bowsher <maxb@ukf.net>
wrote:

> autogen.sh is the only thing which calls build/buildcheck.sh, so is there
> any reason whatsoever to not just inline it?

I'm against it because it would more than double the size of autogen.sh and
make it much less understandable. I'll also comment that subversion's copy
is a fork from httpd's build/buildcheck.sh (now living in APR). -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 31 23:29:19 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Justin Erenkrantz: "Re: The repository is not responding"
Previous message: kfogel_at_collab.net: "Re: svn commit: r12859 - trunk/subversion/clients/cmdline"
In reply to: Max Bowsher: "autogen.sh and build/buildcheck.sh"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]