[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Final(?) Relative Externals format

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2005-01-26 19:37:30 CET

On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 14:02, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Good, I think general consensus is that all 3 forms drawn from RFC2396 are
> acceptable - so we can split the controversial repository relative
> discussion off into a seperate discussion.

Big party pooper here:

I think the forms drawn from RFC2396 are terribly user-unfriendly, and
rely on people memorizing a map from obscure leading punctuation to

Relative URLs in the context of the web are fairly user-friendly because
there is no distinction between "the site" and "the repository". So a
link to "/path" is pretty clearly site-relative. We don't have that

So I'm -0.5 on the RFC2396 forms. I recommend making everything very
explicit, using keywords like "site", "repos", and "scheme" at at the
beginning of the externals (possibly in all-caps in hopes of
distinguishing the keywords from user path elements, although of course
user path elements can be in all-caps as well).

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 26 19:38:52 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.