Re: Final(?) Relative Externals format

* Max Bowsher wrote:

> Hmm. I really don't like the concept of a scheme which actually isn't a
> scheme, it's a modification applied to some other implied scheme.
>
> /// makes more sense to me.

I tend to disagree. It represents a specific addressing scheme (of a
subversion resource) independent from any physical access. A bit like
mailto:.

Further I don't consider /// as compliant, because there is no rule in RFC
2396, which defines a triple slash at the beginning -> it could be rejected
by a strictly compliant URI parser.

nd

-- 
> Rätselnd, was ein Anthroposoph mit Unterwerfung zu tun hat...
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
[...] Dieses Wort gibt so viele Stellen für einen Spelling Flame her, und
Du gönnst einem keine einzige.    -- Jean Claude und David Kastrup in dtl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org