Re: Parseable output: --xml option for more commands
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2005-01-15 17:42:21 CET
Leslie Kishalmi wrote:
Can you say why you would prefer it this way? I know the choice between
FWIW, it looks OK to me and I have no particular objection to it. It is how we
<path
... and it would be sensible to follow that precedent in the absence of any
> And use CDATA as needed.
I'm not sure what you mean: would CDATA be needed in some cases but not other
I believe we have the follwing three options:
<entry ... name="Hello"/> (where attribute "name" is declared as type "CDATA")
As far I can tell from the XML spec, the set of allowable characters is the
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.