[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Parseable output: --xml option for more commands

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2005-01-14 15:17:10 CET

Julian Foad wrote:
> As a next step I will propose XML formats for "status", "list" and "blame".

How about this format for "blame --xml" (non-XML shown first)? (Apologies for
starting with the unrequested "blame --xml" - it just came first in the
alphabet and seemed easiest too.)

~/src/subversion> svn blame ~/tmp/sandbox/t -v -r40:HEAD
      - - - hello -
committed in r17
      - - - bye - committed
in r32
      - - - Third line -
committed in r33
     52 julianfoad 2003-11-27 00:24:15 +0000 (Thu, 27 Nov 2003) Hello
     61 julianfoad 2004-03-20 00:44:03 +0000 (Sat, 20 Mar 2004)
~/src/subversion> svn blame ~/tmp/sandbox/t --xml -v -r40:HEAD
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<blame>
<blameline>
<text>hello - committed in r17</text>
</blameline>
<blameline>
<text>bye - committed in r32</text>
</blameline>
<blameline>
<text>Third line - committed in r33</text>
</blameline>
<blameline>
<revision>52</revision>
<author>julianfoad</author>
<date>2003-11-27T00:24:15.385454Z</date>
<text>Hello</text>
</blameline>
<blameline>
<revision>61</revision>
<author>julianfoad</author>
<date>2004-03-20T00:44:03.836506Z</date>
<text></text>
</blameline>
</blame>

(Without "-v", the "date" elements are omitted, just like in the non-XML case.)

A thought that won't go away is that "blame" really ought to return just the
revision number for each line; the author, date, and any other
revision-specific info - and even the line of text from the file - can be
looked up separately. But I don't think that would be the most useful and
convenient thing to do. Perhaps, though, the XML ought to contain a main
section with just rev numbers and another (log-like) section that maps rev
numbers to author, date, etc. My thoughts lie just on the side of that being
an abstraction which would be suitable for a programming interface, whereas
"--xml" really just needs to give a simple XML wrapping of the normal text
output. Your thoughts?

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 14 15:19:06 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.