[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: DAV locking question

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke_at_gmx.de>
Date: 2005-01-14 00:52:27 CET

Greg Stein wrote:
>>Wouldn't it even be simpler to check for plain text values in DAV:owner,
>>and not to use an extension at all?
> Nope. If some other client sent a "plain text" cdata *and* a custom
> attribute on DAV:owner, then you wouldn't remember to put that
> attribute back when you built a DAV:owner element in a response.
> ...

Agreed. Rephrased:

Wouldn't it even be simpler to check for both plain text values in
DAV:owner and absence of any attributes, and not to use an extension at all?


<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 14 00:53:44 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.