[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Revised Proposal: Improved locking implementation for fsfs

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2005-01-06 13:31:31 CET

On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, [UTF-8] Branko ─^Libej wrote:

> Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> In short, you avoid quadratic I/O behaviour here in exactly the same way
> as we did in the WC -- by caching the entries files. I'm not sure if
> this is a valid thing to do in the face of possibly multi-process access
> to the FS, though.
>
As long as we think that our current APIs, where each lock/unlock requires
at least one network round-trip, I think we shouldn't care very much about
this. Locking 10,000 files in one directory is really a corner case, isn't
it?

Regards,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 6 13:45:19 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.