Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> I have another problem, brane. :-)
>
> On the users@ list, I've been getting reports that my 1.1.2 .zip
> includes a version of libintl that breaks existing 1.1.1 mod_dav_svn
> installations. Apparently your 1.1.1 zip included libintl 0.14, and I
> included 0.12? Or something like that.
The libintl I put in the distro was compiled with iconv support turned
off, so we don't include an iconv.dll. That's because a) we don't _want_
our intl.dll to do any conversions, and b) it's quite unhygienic to have
SVN depend on two iconv packages. I'm guessing your intl.dll was
unchanged, and the missing iconv.dll bit people.
> In any case, I'm confused as to why it should matter at all. I've
> been using the same win32 gettext-0.12 package for the last 8 months
> with no problems. Why would it suddenly jump up and bite people? And
> is there any way the win32 build system can check that gettext is a
> certain minimum version?
Maybe, but that's probably unnecessary. In any case, I use a "normal"
gettext package for building, and only replace intl.dll in the distro.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 6 03:23:26 2005