Re: [Locking] svn up output

Philip Martin wrote:
> "Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> writes:
>
>> I don't want to use the third column. One possibility is to write
>> something on the next line like:
>> U path
>> Lock remvoed.
>> path2
>> Lock removed.
>
> It's inconvenient for a script to have to parse multiple lines like
> that. How about
>
> U path
> B path
> U path2
> S path2

But, lock-changes are not text-changes. What if there are both to report?

I think we *need* to add another column.

Yes, it will break some scripts, but really, *anything* we change will break
some scripts, and we absolutely *must* show lock changes in update output.

Max.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 6 02:19:19 2005