Re: svn log hides log messages

> Say you have a working copy at r5, and commit foo.c, which creates r9.
> Certainly it's safe for the working copy to assume that its foo.c is at
> r9. But it's not safe to assume that the parent directory is at r9:
> what if somebody added or removed entries from the directory somewhere
> in r6, r7, or r8? What if somebody changed the directory's properties?
> Until you run 'svn up', it's not safe to assume that the working copy
> really has r9 of of the directory.

But if you have a working copy at r5 and your commit r6, (ie: a bump of
exacly 1), wouldn't it be safe to assume that your entire working copy
is at r6, without an update?

-- 
Simon Comeau Martel
martelsc@videotron.ca
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org