John Peacock wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>> My example above is the RFC1808 officially defined way to specify a
>> scheme relative URL.
>> I'm really unenthusiastic about deviating from the standard.
>
> You didn't have any problem doing so in your example 2b, though. ;)
Well, I couldn't really not deviate from the standard, when the standard
didn't define *anything* to use in that case, could I? :-)
>> SVK //paths are never used in externals definitions, though, are they?
>
> Well, it's really not the way that SVK operates (since it is intended to
> be a distributed system). For that matter, I think it would be better
> in SVK to create a mirror of the remote repository instead of using
> externals. I don't even know for certain that svn:externals works with
> SVK (or that it doesn't).
>
> I also don't know enough of the internals of SVK to know if this usage
> would cause any difficulties. CLKao does monitor this list, I believe,
> but I've cc'd the svk list to be on the safe side...
Ok.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 4 16:15:39 2005