Re: Building javahl bindings for Subversion 1.1.1

Hi,

RedHat (Fedora) does not ship subversion-javahl binaries as part of the
distribution, because "they don't have a free tool chain to build it".
(Gee, they start to become as political as Debian :-P) That is why I had
to build it myself.

Thanks for the nomination to 1.1.3 inclusion.

        Regards
                Henning

 
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 12:29 -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Thursday, December 30, 2004 11:36 AM +0100 Henning Schmiedehausen
> <hps@intermeta.de> wrote:
>
> > Is this an oversight in subversion-1.1.1 or did I just do something
> > plain wrong and this patch plasters over the effects? I'm using Fedora
> > Core 3 with the subversion-1.1.1-1.1.src.rpm from the Updates. I've
> > attached my patch and the SPEC file to build.
>
> It's an oversight: none of the libraries that libjavahl declared a
> dependency on was connected to libsvn_repos. All of the C binaries
> (svnadmin, svnlook) also have libsvn_repos declared explicitly as a
> dependency.
>
> I've committed a fix in r12576 and will nominate for 1.1.3. I have no clue
> when 1.1.3 would be released though.
>
> As for the RPM, I have no idea about that and will leave that for the RPM
> maintainers. You may wish to file an Issuezilla issue on that so it
> doesn't get lost in the shuffle.
>
> Thanks! -- justin

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
hps_at_intermeta.de        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/
      RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Engineering
What is more important to you...
   [ ] Product Security
or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support
              -- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey