[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SWIG Again

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2004-12-22 02:42:47 CET

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 19:33, Philip Martin wrote:
> Please be careful about giving people conflicting feedback. "The
> changes to make Subversion work with 1.3.24" would be unacceptable
> without an in-tree swig build, unless there was also a lot of
> (potentially very complicated) conditionalizing so that the new code
> also works with older swig versions.

I would not find such a change unacceptable, but obviously you
disagree :) I wasn't aware that you had expressed that opinion, my
apologies if I missed it.

The change only affects those people building the bindings from a
working copy, those building the bindings from a tarball won't need
any SWIG installed.

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Dec 22 02:43:59 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.