Re: [Locking] commit and unlock; revert and unlock

--On Friday, December 17, 2004 1:39 PM -0600 kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> Seriously, when I revert a change, it doesn't necessarily mean I'm not
> working on that problem anymore, it just means I'm undoing a false
> start. I don't think it would be very intuitive for 'revert' to
> unlock things the way 'commit' does -- they're not really symmetrical,
> because they don't both mean "I'm done with this problem now.".

++1. Revert shouldn't unlock at all. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 17 23:00:16 2004