Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 13:09, Julian Foad wrote:
>
>>As usual, I'll recommend providing explicit switches for both ways, so that the
>>default need not be finalised in the first release that supports locking.
>>After one release worth of experience, we may have a better idea of what the
>>default should be, or whether the default should be configurable.
>
> I don't think it would be at all reasonable to change the default for an
> option like this in a later 1.x release. We're stuck with the default
> we choose for 1.2.
Exactly, and we might not want to get stuck. What I meant was that by
providing switches for both ways, we don't have to choose a default yet: the
command fails if a target is locked and neither switch was given. Then we will
still be free to choose a default later.
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 16 19:41:12 2004