On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, [UTF-8] Branko Ä^Libej wrote:
> Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Julian Foad wrote:
> >
> >>>John Szakmeister wrote:
> >>>O.K., unlock the file, but only if it's an explicit target (I count any
> >>>file in a subtree of a directory target to be explicit fo this case).
> >>>
> >>>
> >What would be an non-explicit target? The implicit "."? That would be
> >inconsistent. Saying "svn ci foo.c" won't commit bar.cin the same
> >directory. Just trying to understand what you meant here, brane.
> >
> >
> Actually, I find that I don't know myself what I meant here... possibly
> that we don't unlock "bar/qux" if you commit "foo", but that's obvious.
>
OK. We are in aggreement then.
Do people agree that we unlock by default and don't on --keep-locked
switch? I'll assume so if I don't get massive objections:-)
Regards,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 16 18:50:39 2004