Re: Subversion's use of Berkeley DB [#11511]

On Dec 9, 2004, at 4:16 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:

> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>> --On Thursday, December 9, 2004 10:58 PM +0100 "Branko ?ibej"
>> <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
>>
>>> This is all irrelevant because we can't rely on Apache here. It's
>>> quite
>>> reasonable to use all three RA methods to access the same
>>> repository, so
>>> any such serialisation mechanism must go into libsvn_fs_base.
>>
>>
>> No, it's not. We should add an RA method that indicates that the
>> process is being initialized and advise SVN to perform recovery.
>
> You'd put FS back-end implementation details in an RA method? Yikes.
>

This ignores the fact that there are a number of libsvn_fs users that
are *not* RA layers. Like svnlook, viewcvs, and so on.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 10 03:11:02 2004