[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion's use of Berkeley DB [#11511]

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-12-09 23:28:52 CET

On Dec 9, 2004, at 4:16 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:

> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> --On Thursday, December 9, 2004 10:58 PM +0100 "Branko ?ibej"
>> <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
>>> This is all irrelevant because we can't rely on Apache here. It's
>>> quite
>>> reasonable to use all three RA methods to access the same
>>> repository, so
>>> any such serialisation mechanism must go into libsvn_fs_base.
>> No, it's not. We should add an RA method that indicates that the
>> process is being initialized and advise SVN to perform recovery.
> You'd put FS back-end implementation details in an RA method? Yikes.

This ignores the fact that there are a number of libsvn_fs users that
are *not* RA layers. Like svnlook, viewcvs, and so on.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Dec 10 03:11:02 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.