[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: on-the-fly lock checking

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2004-12-04 01:48:55 CET

C. Michael Pilato wrote:

>I began a rebuttal. Then I actually applied thought. Added a pinch
>of sanity check from Ben Collins-Sussman. And the response is that
>there is no rebuttal to be had.
Ah, I'm glad you agree. :-)

>I suppose we can do much of this right now. Ben can rev create_txn(),
>adding two parameters (one for on-the-fly lock checking, one for
>out-of-dateness). We can implement the on-the-fly lock checking in
>the FS. We can document that we don't do OOD checks yet, and return
>svn_repos_begin_txn_for_commit/update() can pass FALSE for OOD
>checking parameter (now and forever), and we can start deprecating
One bitmap parameter would suffice, I think; we may have other kinds of
checks later on, and this way we don't have to rev create_txn every
time. Otherwise, +1. This will give us a much cleaner API in the long run.

-- Brane

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Dec 4 01:50:11 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.