Julian Foad wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> Read svn-breakage, it's all there. I'll say again that IMNSHO
>> everyons who commits code changes should subscribe to svn-breakage
>> and check at least the FAILed test runs.
>
>
> That's fair enough in principle. I've just re-subscribed and set a
> filter to discard the "PASS" emails.
>
> However, if I was still using a modem, I would be very reluctant to
> subscribe because of the high volume of traffic on that list -
> currently around 2000 emails per month, and they are not tiny.
Well, the PASS mails are about 2k... multiplied by 2000, that's probably
more than you want to download, yes.
> Would you consider posting only a summary of passes?
Not "I", "we" as in "the SVN project"
> Or providing a list that sends only the failures?
Hmmm...
> I think you said before that you like to see the passes, to know that
> they are actually being tested, but I wonder if that still applies now
> that there are so many that it is not feasible to even look carefully
> at the Subject lines. Perhaps it would be better to set up an
> automatic monitoring agent to check that all of your intended tests
> are either passing or sending a failure email? This could
> infrequently (say weekly) send a summary of which tests have been run.
Well, it's really the test framework's job to do things like that.
Patches are always welcome. :-)
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Nov 27 00:51:47 2004