[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Is it ok to use apr 1.x instead of in-tree?

From: Alex Holst <a_at_mongers.org>
Date: 2004-11-26 14:03:06 CET

I have been testing a port of Subversion for OpenBSD, but the porter
decided to use apr(-util) 1.0 instead of the in-tree versions despite my
warnings. The port was even upgraded to apr(-util) 1.0.1 to fix a crash
when working on large sets of data. I have previously been involved in
getting an unauthorized Linux package compiled against apr 1.0 pulled,
so this worries me.

Has the official advice from the Subversion project changed regarding
binary compatibility wrt. apr or should I reinforce my warnings to the
porter?

-- 
I prefer the dark of the night, after midnight and before four-thirty,
when it's more bare, more hollow.                http://a.mongers.org 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 26 14:04:27 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.