Re: svn commit: r11930 - in branches/locking/subversion: include libsvn_fs_base

kfogel@collab.net writes:

> > You will have used 2 indexes. You dump that repos (which has one lock
> > in it, for bar.c), you load into another one. Now, either you have to
> > tell your database backed "Turn off your auto-incrementer, because I'm
> > dictating keys to you" or you have to deal with the fact that the one
> > lock in your dump is only gonna use 1 index in your repos, which means
> > that it will get a different UID than it had before the dump.
>
> Huh? No, you only have to increment the target repository's index to
> the higher of the two repository's auto-incremented next-id fields.
> And bar.c keeps its original lock token, of course.
>
> I'm not sure I understood your paragraph correctly though. Say it
> less tersely?

No, you understood right. And you gave exactly the response I
expected. But that's starting to smell like a layering violation,
dontcha think?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 22 21:18:53 2004