[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Locking: regarding fsfs

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2004-11-20 19:04:55 CET

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> Okay, after a couple of weeks, I think we've hammered out a reasonable
> implementation of locks in BDB. Huge thanks to striker and cmpilato
> (and brane, for preventing us from going down a bad road!)
> The locking branch compiles now, and you can play with the BDB
> repository locks using the three new 'svnadmin' commands. I'm gonna
> start writing some new fs-tests (the C tests) to check that locks are
> being properly enforced during write operations, both on-the-fly and
> at final commit time. The fsfs implementation of locks will be able
> to use the same tests too.

We should really break down fs-tests into general, BDB-specific and
FSFS-specific tests, then make it understand the --fs-type option. Right
now I believe we still test BDB more rigorously than FSFS in the unit tests.

-- Brane

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Nov 20 19:05:57 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.