Re: Case study: Mono switches to Subversion

On 2004-11-17 23:41-0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Thursday, November 18, 2004 12:27 AM -0700 Jani Averbach
> <jaa@jaa.iki.fi> wrote:
>
> >With big, geographically sparce projects the benefits could be very
> >real. What do you think?
>
> *ahem*
>
> <http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/dav-mirror/>
>
> While the branch is admittedly out of date, I bet the crucial modifications
> still apply cleanly. -- justin
>

Interesting, two things about it:

1) If we implement that on the client side, then we get the
   functionality for both of ra_svn and ra_dav at the same time.
   Otherwise, if we implement that on the server, then all clients
   benefits of this immediately.

2) It would be nice if we have a description page for these kind of
   branches. On the page there could be a description what the branch
   is supposed to do, what it does at the moment, todo items and plans
   for future, etc. I think that GCC uses something like that for
   their development branches.

BR, Jani

-- 
Jani Averbach
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org