[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Case study: Mono switches to Subversion

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2004-11-17 22:56:27 CET

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> * The main motivation for maintaining 'Changelog' is because it ends
> up in the final tarball release, distributed to the general
> public. That makes a lot of sense; we have our own CHANGES file
> that we write just before each release, which is just an edited,
> simplified summary of the output of 'svn log'. We do ours just
> before release, they do theirs as they go. The amount of work is
> the same, though data is being duplicated in the Mono case. Not a
> horrible thing.
Why can't they just generate the changelog with svn log, tweaking the
header with some script to look gnuish? Wouldn't each log entry become a
changelog entry?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 17 22:45:57 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.