Re: [PATCH] Rationalize #includes - source compatibility?

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> change. I think we can agree that such code is broken, but,
>> regardless of that, do we feel we need to provide source-level
>> compatibility with such code? If so then I will patch only the
>> private headers.
>
> Regardless of the brokenness of code that relies on the current
> namespace pollution in the headers, I don't think we can remove the
> extra includes. People are relying on it now, and the proper time to
> make such changes is along with the rest of our 'break backwards
> compatability' changes in 2.0.

OK, thanks. I changed only the private headers. I will keep the rest of the
patch for when we are approaching version 2.

- Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 15 03:30:42 2004