Re: svn commit: r11750 - branches/locking/subversion/include

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> Okay, there's been more IRC discussion between me, kfogel, fitz,
> ghudson, and sander.
> Of course, no IRC decisions are ever "official", so I'm re-explaining
> the newest plan here on the list.
>
> I think, ironically, that we're actually preferring to go with the new
> opaque type after all, expanding on branko's idea. :-) It's
> "cleaner" than attaching a username to the fs_t, yet making fs
> functions fetch lock-tokens via callback.
>
> If folks have time, take a look at the latest svn_fs.h on the locking
> branch.

I think this goes in the right direction.

-- Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Nov 6 02:06:59 2004