[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Locking: taking a stand.

From: David Waite <dwaite_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2004-11-04 20:09:57 CET


-David WAite

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:14:24 -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman
<sussman@collab.net> wrote:
> Okay, I'm going to stop waffling and take a position.
> There are two things that need to be accomplished:
> 1. implement a locks table (or tree) of some kind.
> 2. implement logic which knows exactly when to consult the locks
> table.
> I've gotten to the point where I flat-out dislike the idea of
> implementing locks in libsvn_repos. Yes, the idea is nice in that it
> means that we only need to implement #1 exactly once, that it could
> be shared by all backends (BDB, FSFS, and maybe someday SQL). But I
> think this niceness is eclipsed by two big problems:

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 4 20:10:13 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.