[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.1.x r11726: FAIL (i686-pc-linux-gnu shared ra_svn bdb)

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2004-11-03 19:59:02 CET

Philip Martin wrote:
> Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
>>If I understand you correctly, there is some aspect of merging that
>>works on trunk, but is broken - and fails a regression test - in
>>1.1.x. If that is the case, then how did the branch get into that
>>a) A new bug was ported onto the branch;
>>b) A new regression test was ported onto the branch;
> A test that relies on r11479,r11484 which fixes issue 1943 on the
> trunk.

That pair of revisions fixes issue 1943 on the trunk, and also reinstates a
regression test for the bug. Are you saying that another regression test that
also relies on that fix was ported to the branch? If so, surely we should
either remove that other regression test from the branch, or port this fix to
the branch.

- Julian

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 3 19:59:34 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.