[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Locking server implementation: libsvn_repos or libsvn_fs

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-11-02 19:31:37 CET

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 12:42, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > We should probably start another thread to discuss this, but I'd much
> > prefer to see the lock table implemented as a DAG.
>
> So, if I have a lock on trunk/notes/releases.txt, I should necessarily
> also hold a lock on branches/1.1/notes/releases.txt if they happen to be
> the same node-rev?

Don't confuse "implemented as a DAG" with "implemented in the existing
node-revision DAG". Fitz means only the former. The rules of
inheritence need not be the same between those DAGs.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 2 19:34:27 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.