[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Locking server implementation: libsvn_repos or libsvn_fs

From: Mark Phippard <MarkP_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2004-10-29 14:55:54 CEST

cmpilato@localhost.localdomain wrote on 10/28/2004 11:08:37 PM:

> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > Here are the arguments I know of for putting the lock table in the FS
> > back end:
> You forgot one:
> * If the community can't agree about whether to use Berkeley DB or
> some flat-file system to implement the lock table.

That was the one point I wanted to raise as well. We are nearing
completion on our port of Subversion to OS/400. In all likelihood, we
could not have done the port without the fsfs backend. So I am hoping and
praying that the locking implementation will not require BDB, at least
when using a fsfs backend.


Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 29 14:56:24 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.