Re: property co-existence problems.
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2004-10-26 00:38:40 CEST
kfogel@collab.net wrote:
Determining mergeability from the MIME type (directly or indirectly) is
> 3) We determine eol-mungability from textiness.
One can see the attempted logic in that, but as we can't universally define
> The proposal for the "svn:text" property solves problem number (1).
Only in the limited world where there is just one merge algorithm - and we
> And is an object's preferred merging behavior related to its proper
Related, yes, but not very closely. In practice we need to be able to specify
> And are either of these two things related to whether
In my opinion: no. I think we need to move carefully but positively towards
I see the problems as:
A) We determine mergeability and diffability from MIME type regardless of
B) We ignore svn:eol-style for certain MIME types, though there is no need
C) Our interpretation of svn:mime-type is not extensible.
Proposal: we read and use a configurable mapping from MIME types to diff and
[[[
# Plain text files. (There would be a built-in default configuration
# Default (non-)actions. (This section need not be specified)
I think this addresses A and C. B would be addressed by phasing in
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.