Re: [PATCH] Re: slow status, next next version

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Barry Scott wrote:

> Am I right in assuming that this is still not fixed 1.1.1?
>
> I see 4.6 seconds to do svn st -N of the top of the 1.1.1 tag in my
> working copy.

> Let me ask a simple question: Why do you need to lock at all to get a
> status?
> If locking is a problem stop doing it :-)
>
Should be fixed in r11439, but it was fixed rather late in the 1.1.1 cycle
and I didn't want to include more stuff in 1.1.1 at that time. It owuld be
nice to know, however, if it makes any different if you could try the
patch out.

Regards,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 25 21:40:50 2004