Re: another idea for directory locking.

Mark Benedetto King wrote:
> In this case Jane wins. Joe probably needs to roll back all of
> his locks.

By this you seem to be implying that the client code is obtaining the locks, not
the server providing the locks to the client as an atomic operation. If the
server is doing all of the heavy lifting, it should not be difficult at all to
roll back the locks when the conflict is noted. Locking is a transaction, isn't
it, even in this recursive case?

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4720 Boston Way
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5747
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org